︎
Death, Movement, Change and Transformation: The Domain of Matter
SMR Summer Schools at the Campus in Greece
The Summer Institute of SMR in Olympiada Greece
with John Ó
Maoilearca, Thomas Nail and
Joel White,
and Jonathan Fardy as invited lecturer
"Death, Movement, Change and Transformation: The Domain
of Matter"
Dates: 15-22 September 2024, Venue: SMR Campus Olympiada:
Stagira/Akanthos, Greece
- Short Syllabi with a tentative Agenda; Practical
information: application and selection process, organizational details and
participation fees etc., right below the agenda, including a link to the
application form
Summary of the overall course:
Why has something as simple as movement posed such enormous
difficulties for philosophers and scientists in the Western tradition when
other traditions have not had the same trouble? Many of the greatest minds of
Western history have dedicated their lives to the discovery of something
genuinely immobile that could explain why things move," is the question
from which the three master classes offered by Thomas Nail depart. Nail's
series of classes is called Matter and Motion: An Introduction to the Philosophy
of Movement. In the elaboration of his set of master classes offered as part of
the summer school, titled "As Above, So Below: Correspondences, the
Supernothing, and the Hyperbolic," John John Ó Maoilearca says "Here,
the ‘non-‘ will be seen to operate in full plenitude, though at another
level/scope/temporality (rather than ex nihilo – from the inert void below),
The ideas of destruction and negation are consequently re-rendered as
substitution, confusion, or destructive interference between levels." Achille
Mbembe, who has initially confirmed his participation (we are expecting a
reconfirmation of dates and topics) is invited to revisit his materialist
radicalisation of the concept of necropolitics he explored as part of the SMR
Intensive Study Courses in Fall 2021.
Syllabus 1: Thomas Nail
Matter and Motion: An Introduction to the Philosophy of
Movement: 3 Master Classes
This set of classes will introduce students to the
philosophy of movement. Movement is all around us, yet perpetually seems to
evade our attempts to grasp it. It runs like smoke through our fingers changing
and curling in response to how we try to grasp it. What is matter? What is
movement? And why have they occupied, along with death and negativity, the
lowest run on the great chain of being throughout Western thought?
Why has something as simple as movement posed such enormous
difficulties for philosophers and scientists in the Western tradition when
other traditions have not had the same trouble? Many of the greatest minds of
Western history have dedicated their lives to the discovery of something
genuinely immobile that could explain why things move. The Greek philosopher
Aristotle imagined an “unmoved mover” who first propelled and gave order to the
cosmos. The ancient scientist Archimedes imagined that if he had a fixed
fulcrum and a lever long enough, he could move the earth. Later, the
seventeenth-century French philosopher René Descartes reinterpreted
Archimedes’s fulcrum as a point of “certain knowledge” from which the rest of
moving reality could be objectively known. Most modern thinkers, such as
Descartes and Isaac Newton, also shared a belief that God was like an unmoving
clockmaker who set our mechanical universe into motion while he remained still.
Even Albert Einstein’s incorrect theory that we live in a finite “block
universe” was part of the centuries-long effort to explain motion by something
immobile.
But what motivated these pursuits, and what are their
consequences for us today? Alternately, what if we stayed with movement instead
of trying to explain it by something else? Today, there are many books written
on the philosophy of time, space, and even objects, but relatively little on
movement. Why? These may sound like simple questions, but they have taken me a
decade to answer. This class brings together all the key ideas of my research
on the question of movement and materialism of the last ten years into a
general introduction.
Lecture
1: “The Ontology of Movement.”
We will try and
rethink what ontology would mean if we thought of everything as in motion,
without defining motion as the movement between one point and another in space
and time. We will look at the historical emergence of the word “matter” in the
West and try to think about it not as a substance. We will try to think about
matter and motion as indeterminate and relational processes by looking some
early ancient works including pre-Greek Minoan artifacts, Homer, Hesiod, and
Lucretius. Instead of assuming space, time, or substance are ontologically
primary, we will consider an alternative process-oriented definition of
negative materialism. Read: T. Nail, The
Philosophy of Movement: An Introduction (University of Minnesota Press, 2024),
introduction through chapter 5.
Lecture
2: “The History of Movement”
We will consider what this shift in definition means for how
we think about the Western history of art, science, and politics. Much of
Western knowledge production has been motivated by the metaphysical assumptions
that movement is caused or formed by something else. But if there is no higher
cause of motion, as we propose here, what is knowledge-making? In this class,
we try to rethink the history of knowledge as a history of patterns of motion.
Ultimately, in the bigger cosmic and terrestrial picture what is human
knowledge doing? If there are no universal or static forms to found, what is
knowledge’s relation to natural history? Read: T. Nail, Matter and Motion: A
Brief History of Kinetic Materialism (Edinburgh University Press, 2023).
Lecture
3 “The Ethics of Movement”
We consider the ethical and political implications of
placing matter and motion at the bottom of an ontological hierarchy of beings.
We will think about how the present conditions of climate change, global
migration, digital media, and quantum physics have spurred an increasingly
fast-pasted world and yet a planet whose overall entropy and diversity is being
reduced. What has the life-centric focus of Western humanity lost by denying
death? And what tools does the philosophy movement offer us for living well in
such a world? Read: T. Nail, The Philosophy of Movement: An Introduction,
chapter 11, 12, and Conclusion.
Syllabus 2 : John Ó Maoilearca
“As Above, So Below: Correspondences, the Supernothing, and
the Hyperbolic”
This is an all-encompassing description of the sequence of
lectures, divided in 2 to 3 sessions by prof. O Maoilearca, in his own words:
"My recent work has developed concepts of the
‘hyperbolic’ and the ‘supernormal’ as extrapolations or generalisations of
François Laruelle’s ‘philosophical decision’ (the gesture that attempts to make
one thought form depart the rest as their master and overseer) and
‘non-standardisation’ (recognising the philosophies indigenous to putatively
non-philosophical spheres). These generalisations also attempt to render
Laruellean concepts beyond their apparently infra-philosophical,
abstract-cognitive, and anthropocentric domains towards more (immanently)
metaphysical, panpsychist, and cosmological levels. This is a form of
naturalisation without scientism. For example, the concept of the ‘supernormal’
is used as a means to exit any substantive duality between nature and its
supposed opposites (from non-being and the unnatural to the supernatural and
spiritual, mystical) by thinking in terms of a temporalised mereology – levels
of nested temporalities à la Bergson – rather than of hypostatised objects or
dialectically opposed substances. Here, a part-whole approach to thinking about
reality and representation is forwarded, though it is one where the mereology
is temporalized through covariance (moving parts) and heterogeneous
continuities.
These lectures will explore various cases of such
naturalism, at both macro- and micro- level (‘above’ and ‘below’). Firstly, as
regards the micro-, we begin with the negative in dialectic. Here, the ‘non-‘
will be seen to operate in full plenitude, though at another
level/scope/temporality (rather than ex nihilo – from the inert void, below),
The ideas of destruction and negation are consequently re-rendered as
substitution, confusion, or destructive interference between levels. For
instance, the mystical concept of ‘supernothing’ (Angelus Silesius) can be
likened to Bergson’s concept of nothingness as movement in the making, a
supernormal concept that lets us re-view hyperbolic nihilism (Gorgias’
nihilistic approach to thinking and communication par example) as a ‘destructive’
interference between levels or parts. Gorgias’s four-part embargo on nothing –
it exists, it cannot be known, cannot be communicated, cannot be understood –
mutates such that nothingness, lack, the void, or emptiness, are seen as forms
of movement; in particular, as the transmission and reception of images by the brain.
Indeed, this is precisely Bergson’s own theory of the brain – as a receiver and
transmitter of images, a mere communication of micro-movements. This seemingly
‘nihilistic’ approach to the brain (it does not store images, it has no
positive content) is not some sub-Badiouian/Sartrean valorisation of the ego as
void à la Thomas Metzinger, but the real, processual rethinking of what
nothingness and nihilism might mean, with a full, moving ‘supernothing’ at its
core. This ‘mystical’ account does not lead to any hyperbolic excess (the brain
as supernatural agent, for instance), but rather a very ‘ordinary’ account:
‘supernormalisation’ as the extraction of the supernatural nothing by natural
means – micro-movements. To reach above, to the macro or cosmic through the
supernormal, the lectures then turn to the alternative cosmology and
metaphysics found in the films of Jacques Tati. In Tati’s five major films
there exists an indigenous non-standard metaphysics concerning space, memory,
movement, and matter. They tackle physical objects such as motorcars and
bicycles, material processes (flows, fallings, arrivals, departures), and
sensuous memories (of the beach, of posture, of sound). Here, what counts as
‘metaphysics’ does not match the hyperbolic abstractions associated with
‘Platonism’ but rather a ‘Tatiphysics’, a radically immanent film-philosophy.
This is a non-standard model of matter-memory hetero-continuity between small-scale
materials and macro-level ‘abstractions’. Indeed, Tati’s notion of ‘mime’
(whereby each thing becomes a hyperbolic excess or imitation of itself to
create both comedy and horror) can be seen as a model of covariance or
interference between ‘above’ and ‘below’, microworlds and macro-worlds. As
such, they raise the prospect of massively integrative matter-memory correspondences.
The wave-like destructive interferences (hyperbolic annihilation) and
constructive interferences (supernormal naturalization) discussed earlier can
then be seen as allied through likenesses, covariances or correspondences
operating between temporal levels, mimes, and qualia (qualities) that are
neither subjective nor anthropocentric, but panpsychist and cosmic."
Syllabus 3 :
Joel White
“
On Transformative Finitude: From Helmholtz to
Deleuze”
Herman von Helmholtz in his 1854 lecture “On the Interactions of
Forces,” argues that the dogmatic question: “How can I make use
of the known and unknown relations of natural forces so as to construct a
perpetual motion?” was inverted by Sadi Carnot to the critical question: “If a
perpetual motion be impossible, what are the relations which must subsist
between natural forces?” Helmholtz argues that “Everything was gained by this
inversion of the question.”
This talk will follow the line of
philosophical inquiry into the science of energy transformations that runs from
Helmholtz to Deleuze via Nietzsche and Bergson, asking to what extent has this
critical position been upheld? Who among these philosophers of energy fell back
into the dogmatism of perpetual motion and what resources do we have to escape
what Nietzsche called the “longing to believe that somewhere or other, in some
way or other, the world is the same as the old, beloved, infinite and
limitlessly creative God after all.” That is, how can we think the actuality of
transformative finitude or finite transformations.
Jonathan Fardy, title of the Lecture:
The Matter of Theory: Althusser and Laruelle
SCHEDULE
Day 0: Arrivals, and an opening dinner
Day 1
10.00-11.30 John Ó Maoilearca’s Master Class part 1, Lecture 1
11.30-12.00 Coffee and Snacks Break
12.00-13.00 Continuation of John Ó Maoilearca Lecture 1 combined with interactive input from the students.
13.00-16.30 Lunch break and beach time
16.30-18.00 Student work in plenary: exchange among the participants in breakout groups, moderated by John Ó Maoilearca
Day 2
10.00-11.30 John Ó Maoilearca’s Master Class part 2
11.30-12.00 Coffee and Snacks Break
12.00-13.00 Continuation of John Ó Maoilearca’s Lecture 2 combined with interactive input from the students: open discussion, Q&A and comments.
13.00-16.30 Lunch break and beach time
16.30-18.00 Student work in plenary: continuation of the breakout groups from the previous day, moderated by John Ó Maoilearca.
Day 3
10.00-11.30 John Ó Maoilearca’s Master Class part 3
11.30-12.00 Coffee and Snacks Break
12.00-13.00 Continuation of John Ó Maoilearca’s Lecture 2 combined with interactive input from the students: open discussion, Q&A and comments.
13.00-16.30 Lunch break and beach time
16.30-18.00 Student work in plenary: Presentations by the students/participants, moderated by John Ó Maoilearca and/or Katarina Kolozova
Day 4
10.00-11.30 Nail’s Lecture 1
11.30-12.00 Coffee and Snacks Break
12.00-13.00 Continuation of Nail’s Lecture 1 combined with
interactive input from the students: open discussion, Q&A and comments.
13.00-16.30 Lunch break and beach time
16.30-18.00 Student work in groups on topics chosen during
the morning lecture, breakout sessions supervised by Nail and Nocek/Kolozova
Day 5
10.00-11.30 Nail’s Lecture 2
11.30-12.00 Coffee and Snacks Break
12.00-13.00 Continuation of Nail’s Lecture 2 combined with
interactive input from the students: open discussion, Q&A and comments.
13.00-16.30 Lunch break and beach time
16.30-18.00 Student work in plenary: exchange among the
breakout groups from the previous day, moderated by Nail and Kolozova; ALTERNATIVE: Nail’s Lecture 3.
Day 6
10.00-11.30
Joel White:
On Transformative Finitude or Finite
Transformations: From Helmholtz to Deleuze
11.30-12.00 Coffee and Snacks Break
12.00-13.00 Student presentations based on either their
reaction to the content offered at the school or reports, papers, presentations
in a different form of one’s choice that have been prepared prior to the school
and announced to be presented. Facilitated by the instructor/s and a student
(junior SMR staff)
13.00-16.30 Lunch break and beach time
16.30-18.00 Student presentations based on either their
reaction to the content offered at the school or reports, papers, presentations
in a different form of one’s choice that have been prepared prior to the school
and announced to be presented. Facilitated by the instructor/s and a student
(junior SMR staff)
Day 7
Free day with optional program SMR will organize for those
interested; Among the offered options will be: A one day tour "In the
Footsteps of Aristotle”, Visit to Mount Athos, Visit to the archaeological site
of Stagira, the birthplace of Aristotle, and other options (like the Aristotle
National Park). We will ask you to select options in your application forms and
in that way we will know well ahead of time what to organize. Certainly, anyone
can make arrangements of their own choice. Staying at the beach is also an
option that anyone can use freely.
18.00-19.00 Jonathan Fardy (Optional program):
The Matter of Theory: Althusser and Laruelle
Informal Program: Students/participants can propose and
organize their own activities like movie screening and discussions in the
shared space on the ground floor ending at 10.30 PM latest.
Practicalities:
We made sure that we follow the ancient Greek principle of
philosophical study, including also arts and sciences, being scholē (leisure
time, pleasure and play). The institute is placed in what was once Stagira
after all, the birthplace of Aristotle. The program is structured in such a way
that it allows for enjoying the sun and the beach of the Aegean Sea as well as
socialising with the rest of the group, visiting local tavernas, taking trips
to nearby archaeological sites and visits to Thessaloniki and other interesting
nearby location. Olympiada is the contemporary name of ancient Stagira, the
birthplace of Aristotle, located in the northern part of the region of
Macedonia of Greece. The climate is mild, the area is surrounded by continental
rather than Mediterranean flora and fauna. It is surrounded by green
mountainous area. Mount Athos is only 70-80 miles away.
Hybrid format module: For those who cannot make it to the
Campus, we have reserved the option for online participation; please, bear in
mind that its possibilities are limited compared to the in-person participation
(interaction with faculty and community, informal program, presentations,
etc.). The fee for the online variant is 300 euro.
For Global South there is automatic discount of 30%(on the overall price, excluding online participation).
Fees and what they cover
- 1000 euro for 7 days full package: It covers both the program participation fee and hosting you at the Campus premises.
[Breakdown of costs explained in the call is revised due to rebalancing of the budget. However, all the elements of what hosting you on campus is as explained in the call are retained and still valid.]
- Important: The amount can be paid in instalments; you just
need to choose the option in the application form.
How to Apply: Interested applicants can find the full
application form here, as well as at the very bottom of this page. All
application forms must be filled out in full and sent in by February 27th,
2024, in order to be considered valid. If you have any inquiries, please send
them to all of the following email address:
schoolofmaterialistresearch@gmail.com
Regarding
housing and food:
The full participation fee enables the SMR organizer to secure affordable lodging in Olympiada through our local partner tour operators.SMR can house up to 15 students/participants of its Summer Institute programs, and its cost is included
in the participation fee. It also offers fridges and stove in the shared
kitchen/coffee station area you can prepare your own food (however cooking elaborate
meals is not allowed, more snacks, salads, etc.). Laundry area is provided as
well. Showers and bathrooms are shared but at least three on each floor (all
areas are renovated and clean)
Important: All those who cannot submit an early application
to make sure they will be accommodated at the SMR building, can either find an
accommodation in a walking distance with our help (for a discount price) or
directly themselves via booking and other platforms, as well as the local tour
operators whose contact details will be provided.
Regarding food, some of the meals will be prearranged by SMR
in collaboration with the local tavernas, and that cost is also included in the
price, at least one meal is served/catered at the Institute daily, and it is
covered by the subsistence fee.
All the snacks and coffee plus water is provided by SMR.
Ground transportation from the airport: Olympada is
only 50 minutes away by car from the Thessaloniki airport should you share a
care or find a direct shuttle. Unfortunately, the shuttles from the airport are
slower due to making stops. If you want us to arrange transportation for you,
please indicated in the application but keep in mind that we will have to group
you with others arriving at around a similar hour, so we will have to let you
know if the arrangement can be made and also how much it will cost (should it
turn our that a car is picking up one person). After we offer you options, you
will make your own choice and let us know. This will not be included in the
fee, but we will make sure the prices for our participants are highly
favourable. Here are some useful links should you choose to arrange your own
transportation: Hellas Chauffeur https://tinyurl.com/yxr4skf2 , or Welcome
Pickups https://tinyurl.com/2s3zjxt9 , and many other links that can be found
on the airport website.
What you earn after the School: An ECTS certificate
of completion of 2 credits (1 ECTS = 28 hours of not only class but also you
individual work or preparation and project/presentation writing/creating),
cosigned by ISSHS (Holder of the Erasmus Charter for Higher Education
2021-2027, and endowed with the right to assign ECTS for informal study
programs) and CPT-ASU (US), co-members of SMR.